
this article today in the new york times on anatole broyard has sparked an obsession...
(from "is race obsolete? a move to change racial designations in the us census underscores some prickly questions about who we are" by seth schiesel & robert l. turner, the boston globe, sept. 22, 1996)
"when anatole broyard was born, in new orleans in 1920, his race was identified as "negro," the same as that of all his ancestors, on both sides of the family, for more than a century. but, along the way, something curious happened: as henry louis gates jr. described it in the new yorker this year, broyard 'was born black and became white.'
broyard, the late literary critic of the new york times, was light-skinned; gradually, he shed acknowledgment of his racial heritage as he rose to prominence in new york social and cultural circles. he often succeeded. he married a white woman, and for many years he did not tell their children about his racial background. indeed, he introduced his children to his light-skinned sister but never let them meet his other sister, who had darker skin."
he was also the inspiration behind the protagonist coleman silk in philip roth's enthralling novel the human stain. the article has me scouring the internet for any and all mentions of this fascinating man and his story, and more so, thinking about the more complicated (though obvious) question of race...what does it mean to be "black" or "white" and what does that do to the identity of "mixed race" people (everyone, of course, being "mixed race" to some degree)...
(from "the passing of anatole broyard" by henry louis gates):
"to pass is to sin against authenticity, and "authenticity" is among the founding lies of the modern age. the philosopher charles taylor summarizes its ideology thus: "there is a certain way of being human that is my way. i am called upon to live my life in this way, and not in imitation of anyone else's life. but the notion gives a new importance to being true to myself. if i am not, i miss the point of my life; i miss what being human is for me." and the romantic fallacy of authenticity is only compounded when it is collectivized: when the putative real me gives way to the real us. you can say that anatole broyard was (by any juridical reckoning) "really" a negro, without conceding that a negro is a thing you can really be. the vagaries of racial identity were increased by what anthropologists call the rule of "hypodescent"—the one-drop rule. when those of mixed ancestry—and the majority of blacks are of mixed ancestry— disappear into the white majority, they are traditionally accused of running from their "blackness." yet why isn't the alternative a matter of running from their "whiteness"? to emphasize these perversities, however, is a distraction from a larger perversity. you can't get race "right" by refining the boundary conditions."
kafka was the rage: a greenwich village memoir. by anatole broyard (new york times review)
kafka was the rage review by lee lady
back when skin color was destiny — unless you passed for white by brent staples














































































